|
Post by Chris Stockwell on Feb 13, 2007 9:24:49 GMT
Has anyone had a problem with their time as published in the results? Martin Keegan's time is out by nearly 2 mins. This is not the first time they have had problems with the results, I don't know why they don't use chip timing with such a large field.
|
|
|
Post by skydivingdude on Feb 13, 2007 11:10:06 GMT
I have to say my time is out by 30 secs. The wrong way. I agree that it should be time chipped. It cant be easy trying to get all the race Numbers and times in together. It was easy to see that they were struggling near the end of the race when large numbers came in. It was a great run all the same and I really enjoyed it. That is a nice flat course. Well done to all that took part even after hard cross countries the day before !
|
|
DaveT
Junior Member
Posts: 23
|
Post by DaveT on Feb 13, 2007 18:53:59 GMT
I'd like to say that my time is out by about 6 minutes - but unfortunately it's correct.
At least they've acknowledged that the medals are incorrect (they have the year as 2006 for those who haven't noticed) and are going to send out new ones.
|
|
jerry
Junior Member
Posts: 36
|
Post by jerry on Feb 15, 2007 13:03:06 GMT
Quite enjoyed it overall, but had forgotten the type of pain that the legs suffer when doing a half marathon, especially when it is the longest run I had done since September.
Did anyone else notice the slight headwind on the way out and then the slight headwind on the way back or was it just me???
Greatly enjoyed the post race pint also.
|
|